At the end of Russian-Turkish War thousands of Muslim Georgians had to flee from their homeland. They wished to find “new hope” in Turkey. Georgians used to choose the places similar to Georgia in weather, forest, river valleys and natural features. According to villagers in 1880s their ancestors were led to the side of Hayriye By Imam Haci Mehmet Efendi Kochaoghli, Husein Agha Khinkiladze also took a great part to establish the village.

The national symbols, national ideals are the values of great importance in the process of studding the union identity. From the point of view of the national symbols study in the history of the Georgian Union identity the 10’s of the 20th century is exceptional.

In the article the author discusses the tradition of the anti-Georgian annexationist policy of Russia, the Tsarist, Bolshevist-Soviet and post-Soviet. He argues that with respect to Georgia, there never were, and evidently never will be two Russias – “good” and “bad.” Russia, whether Tsarist (1783-1917), Bolshevist-Soviet (1921-1991) or post-Soviet (1991- up to date) was always consistent in its political aspirations with regards to Georgia and the Caucasus, changing only its outer “shell” but not the essence. The article discusses also the fatal mistakes committed by the political leaders of Georgia in 1783, 1920-1921 and 1992-1995.

The article deals with the events that occurred in Trabzon Empire and Georgia according to the historical account in "Memoirs of a Janizary" by a Serbian author of XV century, Constantine Michael from Ostrowicy. What makes it particularly important is the fact that it is an eye-witness account. The author of the article posits that the "Memoirs" contain some erroneous conclusions about Georgia. The article offers a critical analysis of the aforementioned account and includes a Georgian translation of its part concerning the Trabzon Empire and Georgia.